Skip to main content

Publications

ACTIVATE Program Running Publication List
(arranged alphabetically by year)

Each link given below will open its target document/page in a new window.

Submitted / In Review

Braun et al., Cloud, Aerosol, and Radiative Properties over the Western North Atlantic Ocean, JGR-Atmospheres.

Dadashazar, H., et al., Cloud Drop Number Concentrations over the Western North Atlantic Ocean: Seasonal Cycle, Aerosol Interrelationships, and Other Influential Factors, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.

Mardi et al., Analysis of Biomass Burning Plumes Impacting the United States East Coast and Western North Atlantic Ocean: Implications for Clouds, Radiative Forcing, and Air Quality, JGR – Atmospheres.

Tornow et al., Preconditioning of overcast-to-broken cloud transitions by riming in marine cold air outbreaks, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Disc.

2021

Aldhaif et al., An Aerosol Climatology and Implications for Clouds at a Remote Marine Site: Case Study over Bermuda, JGR-Atmospheres, Accepted.

Corral A., et al., An Overview of Atmospheric Features Over the Western North Atlantic Ocean and North American East Coast – Part 1: Analysis of Aerosols, Gases, and Wet Deposition Chemistry, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020JD032592.

Edwards et al., Impact of various air mass types on cloud condensation nuclei concentrations along coastal southeast Florida, Atmos. Env., Accepted.

Ma et al., Contrasting Wet Deposition Composition Between Three Diverse Islands and Coastal North American Sites, Atmospheric Environment, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117919.

Painemal, et al., An Overview of Atmospheric Features Over the Western North Atlantic Ocean Region and North American East Coast – Part 2: Atmospheric Circulation, Atmospheric Boundary, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1029/2020JD033423.

2020

Aldhaif, A.M. et al., Sources, Frequency, and Chemical Nature of Dust Events Impacting the United States East Coast, Atmos. Env., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117456.

Corral A., et al., Source Apportionment of Aerosol at a Coastal Site and Relationships with Precipitation Chemistry: A Case Study over the Southeast United States, Atmosphere, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11111212.

Crosbie, E., et al., Coupling an online ion conductivity measurement with the Particle-into-Liquid Sampler: evaluation and modeling using laboratory and field aerosol data, Aerosol Sci. and Tech., https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2020.1795499.

Dadashazar, H., et al., Stratocumulus cloud clearings: statistics from satellites, reanalysis models, and airborne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4637-4665, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4637-2020.

Gryspeerdt, E., et al., Surprising similarities in model and observational aerosol radiative forcing estimates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 613–623, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-613-2020.

MacDonald et al., On the Relationship Between Cloud Water Composition and Cloud Droplet Number Concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7645–7665, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7645-2020
.

Painemal, D. et al., Reducing uncertainties in satellite estimates of aerosol–cloud interactions over the subtropical ocean by integrating vertically resolved aerosol observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7167–7177, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7167-2020.

Park, H. J., T. Sherman, L. S. Freire, G. Wang, D. Bolster, P. Xian, A. Sorooshian, J. S. Reid, and D. H. Richter (2020), Predicting Vertical Concentration Profiles in the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer With a Markov Chain Random Walk Model, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125(19), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032731.

Schlosser, J. et al., Relationships between Supermicrometer Sea Salt Aerosol and Marine Boundary Layer Conditions: Insights from Repeated Identical Flight Patterns, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125, e2019JD032346. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032346.

Schulze et al., Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity over the Northeast Pacific Ocean: Impacts on prediction of CCN and stratocumulus cloud droplet number concentrations, Earth and Space Science, 7, e2020EA001098. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EA001098.

Sorooshian, A. et al., Atmospheric Research Over the Western North Atlantic Ocean Region and North American East Coast: A Review of Past Work and Challenges Ahead, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 125, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031626.

Yu, H. et al., Interannual variability and trends of combustion aerosol and dust in major continental outflows revealed by MODIS retrievals and CAM5 simulations during 2003–2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 139–161,2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-139-2020.

2019

Brunke, M. A., Ma, P.‐L., Reeves Eyre, J. E. J., Rasch, P. J., Sorooshian, A., & Zeng, X. (2019). Subtropical Marine Low Stratiform Cloud Deck Spatial Errors in the E3SMv1 Atmosphere Model. Geophysical Research Letters, 46, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL084747.

Fanourgakis, G. et al., Evaluation of global simulations of aerosol particle and cloud condensation nuclei number, with implications for cloud droplet formation. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8591-9617, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8591-2019.

Mardi, A. H., Dadashazar, H., MacDonald, A. B., Crosbie, E., Coggon, M. M., Aghdam, M. A., et al. (2019). Effects of Biomass Burning on Stratocumulus Droplet Characteristics, Drizzle Rate, and Composition. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 124, 12,301–12,318. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031159.

Sorooshian, A. et al., Aerosol-Cloud-Meteorology Interaction Airborne Field Investigations: Using Lessons Learned from the U.S. West Coast in the Design of ACTIVATE off the U.S. East Coast, Bull. Am. Met. Soc., August 2019, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0100.1.

June 14, 2021

This past week included two double-flight days on Monday-Tuesday (June 7-8). June 7 was notable in that the second flight (RF 80) was a “process study” flight, which accounts for approximately 10% of ACTIVATE flights. We targeted an area with a cluster of clouds and conducted a total of 10 Falcon legs in cloud at different altitudes ranging from ~2 to ~13 kft. These legs and a subsequent downward spiral resulted in 10 cloud water samples for a single cloud system. Simultaneously, the King Air conducted a ‘wheel and spoke” pattern far above to allow the remote sensors to characterize the environment and cloud that the Falcon was directly sampling. A total of 14 dropsondes were launched by the King Air in the ~3 hr flight. This flight and the other “process study” flight in this summer campaign (RF77 on June 2) will provide a remarkable dataset to investigate aerosol-cloud-meteorology interactions with very detailed measurements for single evolving cloud systems.

June 7, 2021

Four successful joint flights occurred last week. The double flight day on Wednesday June 2 was particularly noteworthy. Our morning flight conducted our typical statistical survey flight plan to an area south of the Virginia coast where there was a cumulus cloud field, with some regions evolving into deeper, more organized, convection. Based on that flight and satellite imagery, we set up the second flight to execute a “process study” pattern where the Falcon conducted a series of transects through a selected cloud cluster to characterize the vertical microphysical properties of the developing cluster immediately followed by an environmental profile in the surrounding cloud-free region. Simultaneously, the King Air conducted a “wheel and spoke” pattern centered around the cloud system, with multiple dropsondes launched above, and on the periphery of the cloud cluster alongside remote sensing transects to characterize the cloud and aerosol system underneath. Data from both planes will be used to characterize the range of cloud types observed on that day, with a focus on understanding the processes that drive shallow cumulus organization.

June 1, 2021

The last two weeks were busy with 9 joint flights, including three separate double-sortie days. The May 21 morning flight in particular was intriguing with a mixture of different conditions offshore with the two aircraft flying mostly straight to the east and then returning on the same track to NASA LaRC. Closer to shore, the aircraft observed a stratus deck with a prominent aerosol layer just above cloud as observed by the HSRL-2. These clouds then transitioned progressively into a more scattered cumulus cloud field to the east. At the far eastern end of the track there was a cold pool that we sampled within and just outside. Throughout this and the other flights this past week, there was evidence both either (or both) smoke and dust in the free troposphere. Measurement data will help unravel how these various aerosol types interact with the different types of clouds such as in the May 21 flights. On May 19, we also coordinated the flight along the CALIPSO satellite track where both aircraft and the satellite had successful made measurements.

May 17, 2021

After a short break after the Winter 2021 campaign, ACTIVATE took back to the skies this past week to start the Summer 2021 campaign. We conducted 4 successful joint flights between May 13-15 with interesting cloud conditions in each flight. The lower-flying Falcon characterized multiple layers of clouds and observed both warm and mixed-phase precipitation. Remote sensing observations on the higher-flying King Air detected aerosol layers aloft in the free troposphere potentially from dust and smoke on separate flights.

April 5, 2021

ACTIVATE wrapped up its winter 2021 flight campaign with five joint research flights this past week (RF 57-61) capped off by a double-flight day on Friday (4/2) to capitalize on another cold air outbreak event. Those two flights included an increased number of dropsondes (~10 per flight) to get extensive temporal and spatial characterization of the vertical atmospheric structure as the cold air outbreak cloud field evolved during the day. Notable in the other flights last week was successful coordination with ASTER and CALIPSO overpasses in our flight region.

March 29, 2021

We executed a joint flight (RF 56) on Tuesday March 23rd on a day marked by fairly ‘clean’ conditions in terms of very low aerosol and cloud drop number concentrations in the marine boundary layer. Cloud fraction on this day was markedly lower than a typical cold air outbreak type of day, which is helpful for ACTIVATE which is aiming to generate statistics in a wide range of conditions associated with aerosols, clouds, and meteorology.

March 22, 2021

The previous week posed significant weather challenges but Saturday (March 20, 2020) did finally provide low clouds evolving in a cold air outbreak. Interesting features in that joint flight (Research Flight 55) were Asian dust residing aloft above the boundary layer clouds, in addition to an interesting layer of depolarizing aerosol right above clouds near the end of flight as observed by the HSRL-2; it is unclear what the source of that layer was, but data analysis with the Falcon data will help unravel those details.

March 15, 2021

ACTIVATE conducted four more successful joint flights (Research Flights 51-54) this past week. We characterized a variety of cloud conditions including post-frontal clouds associated with another cold air outbreak on Monday (March 8) in contrast to the following day (Tuesday March 9) where there was a sharp inversion with uniform cloud top heights and generally thin clouds. Flights this past week were marked by influence from local and regional burning emissions. The second of two flights on Friday (March 12) was coordinated with a CALIPSO overpass.

March 8, 2021

ACTIVATE executed three successful joint flights (Research Flights 48-50) this past week. On Thursday March 4th we coordinated our flight with a NASA A-Train overpass over an area with some scattered marine boundary layer clouds. The back-to-back flights on Friday March 5th served two objectives to capitalize on an excellent cold air outbreak event: (i) characterize the aerosol and meteorological characteristics upwind of the cloud field farther downwind; and (ii) characterize the evolution of the cloud field with the desire to capture the transition from overcast cloudy conditions to open cell structure. Noteworthy features in these flights were dust layers from long-range transport and significant new particle formation.

Febraury 5, 2021

ACTIVATE’s had its first joint flight of the winter 2021 campaign on February 3. We were successful to sample a transition from overcast stratocumulus clouds to broken cumulus clouds near our farthest southeast point of the flight track. There was extensive mixed-phase precipitation in areas closer to shore but pure liquid clouds farther offshore coinciding with the open cell cloud field. Although at low optical depth, an interesting aerosol layer was observed above 6 km that most likely was dust due to its depolarizing nature.

January 30, 2020

This past week ACTIVATE took to the skies again to begin our 2021 winter campaign. In contrast to last year, we started a bit earlier in the month of January to capitalize on a higher frequency of cold air outbreak events. Friday’s flights (January 29) were particularly ideal with both aircraft sampling along cloud streets aligned with the predominant wind direction coming from the north/northwest. We observed a transition from supercooled droplets to mixed phase precipitation with distance away from shore.